Теократический Монархист (ign) wrote,
Теократический Монархист



Я не стал включать это во вчерашний пост, чтобы излишне его не перегружать, но теперь приведу довольно длинную цитату из Юваля Харари, как раз по поводу разных культур. Обсуждая вначале традиционные формы расизма, далее он пишет следующее:

… Such racist theories, prominent and respectable for many decades, have become anathema among scientists and politicians alike. People continue to conduct a heroic struggle against racism without noticing that the battlefront has shifted, and that the place of racism in imperial ideology has now been replaced by ‘culturism’. There is no such word, but it’s about time we coined it. Among today’s elites, assertions about the contrasting merits of diverse human groups are almost always couched in terms of historical differences between cultures rather than biological differences between races. We no longer say, ‘It’s in their blood.’ We say, ‘It’s in their culture.’

Thus European right-wing parties which oppose Muslim immigration usually take care to avoid racial terminology. Marine le Pen’s speechwriters would have been shown the door on the spot had they suggested that the leader of the Front National go on television to declare that, ‘We don’t want those inferior Semites to dilute our Aryan blood and spoil our Aryan civilisation.’ Instead, the French Front National, the Dutch Party for Freedom, the Alliance for the Future of Austria and their like tend to argue that Western culture, as it has evolved in Europe, is characterised by democratic values, tolerance and gender equality, whereas Muslim culture, which evolved in the Middle East, is characterised by hierarchical politics, fanaticism and misogyny. Since the two cultures are so different, and since many Muslim immigrants are unwilling (and perhaps unable) to adopt Western values, they should not be allowed to enter, lest they foment internal conflicts and corrode European democracy and liberalism.

Such culturist arguments are fed by scientific studies in the humanities and social sciences that highlight the so-called clash of civilisations and the fundamental differences between different cultures. Not all historians and anthropologists accept these theories or support their political usages. But whereas biologists today have an easy time disavowing racism, simply explaining that the biological differences between present-day human populations are trivial, it is harder for historians and anthropologists to disavow culturism. After all, if the differences between human cultures are trivial, why should we pay historians and anthropologists to study them?

See copy at dreamwidth for more comments; currently it has comment count unavailable.
Tags: общество

  • Gaetz

    Забавная статья в NYTimes, как Matt Gaetz пытался перед уходом Трампа заручиться от него “blanket pre-emptive pardon”. Трамп,…

  • «Политическая позиция — обычно искренняя и случайная»

    Лео Каганов написал весьма эмоциональный пост (т.е. в его случае, это означает с большим количеством мата) в защиту Тёмы Лебедева, по поводу…

  • 30 лет спустя

    Вот примерно как я тогда выглядел Ну да, ровно 30 лет назад, 2 сентября 1991 года, я впервые прилетел в США. Мне было 24 года, и хотя я…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.